Statement of Principles:
- American taxpayers are entitled to open access on the Internet to the peer-reviewed
scientific articles on research funded by the U.S. Government.
- Widespread access to the information contained in these articles is an essential, inseparable component of our
nation's investment in science.
- This and other scientific information should be shared in cost-effective ways that take
advantage of the Internet, stimulate further discovery and innovation, and advance the
translation of this knowledge into public benefits.
- Enhanced access to and expanded sharing of information will lead to usage by millions
of scientists, professionals, and individuals, and will deliver an accelerated return on
the taxpayers' investment.

A new feature of the ATA site, Perspectives will highlight voices across the coalition on the enduring and often personal importance of public access to taxpayer-funded research in individual lives. (9/5/08)
Recent News:
(September 19, 2008)
In Blunt Terms, Copyright Lawyers, Researchers, Librarians Blast Anti-NIH Bill
(September 17, 2008)
Open access under attack
(September 16, 2008) NIH UPDATE: Congressional hearing on legislation to overturn the NIH Public Access Policy
(September 16, 2008) Nobel prize-winners still insist on their support for public access [PDF]
(September 12, 2008)
Congressional Hearing Over Public Access Filled With High Drama - Subscription required
(September 5, 2008)
NIH Public Access Policy To Face Copyright Challenge in Congress?
(September 4, 2008)
NIH Update: PubMed Central Numbers Surge Dramatically in July
(July 25, 2008)
Guidance for researchers on the NIH Public Access Policy
[PDF] An article by Norka Ruis Bravo, in the July newsletter of the American Society for Cell Biology
(July 15, 2008) PubMed up for public service award
Subscription required
(July 11, 2008) NIH Public Access Policy Does Not Affect U.S. Copyright Law
In response to the NIH’s second request for information and public comment on the revised, mandatory public access policy, the Association of American Publishers (AAP) commissioned a legal brief to attempt to raise additional questions about the policy. The brief falsely asserts that the NIH policy amends U.S. copyright law and adversely affects current international trade agreements. To make clear the misleading nature of AAP’s assertions, and to help reiterate that the NIH policy has no affect on U.S. copyright law or international trade, SPARC and ARL, with advice from legal counsel, have prepared a detailed response to AAP’s arguments.
Be sure to check our Media page for news on the latest developments in public access.
Join the Alliance now.